Scholarship table
Packers gotta like where they sit now.
Game hasta be played on the field, but on paper, Seattle or Philly is a more ideal matchup that NO.
After barely surviving Detroit, I don’t think there is such thing as ideal matchup for them. Philly has already won in Lambeau this year. It will be a struggle no matter the opponent. Especially if Rodgers doesn’t come out of his funk
My apathy toward the length of the Packers playoff run goes out the window when the Seahawks come to town.
Opting for McCown as your back up QB with a clearly better option out there.
That shot of Carroll celebrating made my blood boil. Hope we dominate him and Wilson. Though, that has not been an easy task for GB.
Does that td get called back in the regular season?
Hope you didn’t parlay that.
That is the weakness of allowing PI calls to be reviewed. By the book, it was cearly PI. But that's rarely called so I get why no flag was thrown.So what exactly should be reviewed?
I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but the Saints complaints and protestations that lead to the rule change made refs and the NFL “look bad”. So I don’t think there was any chance they review that. The refs have shown themselves to be pretty petty about it this year, given how few calls get changed even when pretty clearly wrong.If you “review” every scoring play, the DB clearly jerks backwards with the push, no clue how that’s not further examined.
I've said it before - the PI rule is already subjective, and now the NFL has over-legislated it by adding more subjectivity in the review process (or whether to initiate a review, if inside 2 mins). They have such a terrible habit of legislating to prevent this one, specific outcome with disregard for any nuanced impact elsewhere. Let's take the NFL at its word (LOL!) that this was reviewed. I don't think you objectively look at that and say that it wasn't OPI when the defender not only stops, but jerks backwards. But the call on the field was TD, and this wasn't 'egregious' enough? You either eliminate this bogus secondary standard, or go back to the naked eye test (the correct call, imo). The former would result in a TON of overturns, which the league surely doesn't want.
No. There was nothing there