collapse

* Recent Posts

Crean vs Buzz vs Wojo vs Shaka by MUDPT
[May 04, 2024, 10:05:13 PM]
2024 Transfer Portal by wadesworld
[May 04, 2024, 09:36:37 PM]
Big East 2024 Offseason by TSmith34, Inc.
[May 04, 2024, 08:28:28 PM]
2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by Nukem2
[May 04, 2024, 01:57:07 PM]
Most Painful Transfers In MUBB History? by Jay Bee
[May 04, 2024, 10:20:49 AM]
Marquette NBA Thread by Uncle Rico
[May 04, 2024, 07:00:37 AM]
Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by MU82
[May 03, 2024, 05:21:12 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: SCOTUS Hears NCAA Amatuerism Restrictions Case  (Read 667 times)

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5146
SCOTUS Hears NCAA Amatuerism Restrictions Case
« on: March 31, 2021, 01:55:24 PM »
Logged

HouWarrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 868
Re: SCOTUS Hears NCAA Amatuerism Restrictions Case
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2021, 02:37:03 PM »
As noted in the justice's comments, such were not the normal oral argument Q&A type queries on positions or points...almost all the justices were simply telegraphing their takes. Looks very bad for NCAA. Guessing a 6-3 NCAA loss on the issue appealed....

The bigger door beyond this case is a finding that NCAA structure is violative of antitrust...congress gave baseball an exemption, but wont  give one to NCAA....College free agency? Speculations are entertaining
Logged
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5146
Re: SCOTUS Hears NCAA Amatuerism Restrictions Case
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2021, 04:42:42 PM »
Quote from: houwarrior on March 31, 2021, 02:37:03 PM
As noted in the justice's comments, such were not the normal oral argument Q&A type queries on positions or points...almost all the justices were simply telegraphing their takes. Looks very bad for NCAA. Guessing a 6-3 NCAA loss on the issue appealed....

The bigger door beyond this case is a finding that NCAA structure is violative of antitrust...congress gave baseball an exemption, but wont  give one to NCAA....College free agency? Speculations are entertaining

If they do rule in favor of the athletes it will affect the P5/P6 schools in football and basketball moreso. Many of athletes that go to those schools are looking toward the NFL/NBA or Euro-leagues whereas I think especially in basketball the players in the mid-major or low major programs are truly getting their athletic scholarships today to pay for their 4 year under graduate academic education.

Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »