collapse

* Recent Posts

Bill Scholl Retiring by The Hippie Satan of Hyperbole
[Today at 10:43:01 AM]


[New to PT] Big East Roster Tracker by Uncle Rico
[Today at 09:59:47 AM]


Crean vs Buzz vs Wojo vs Shaka by brewcity77
[May 08, 2024, 01:39:16 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by DFW HOYA
[May 08, 2024, 10:45:35 AM]


MU appearance in The Athletic's college hoops mailbag by zcg2013
[May 08, 2024, 08:59:21 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: ORD Expansion/Modernization  (Read 8159 times)

DegenerateDish

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
ORD Expansion/Modernization
« on: February 26, 2018, 11:58:39 PM »
For those of you that use ORD a lot, thoughts on what you’d like to see as part of this $8.5 billion expansion and modernization project?

For me, the biggest improvement will be once I-390 opens and hopefully I-490 gets approved and built. I-190 is perhaps the most ill conceived roadway to/from an airport in the US. Adding capacity at ORD without addressing the horrendous design of getting in and especially out of the airport would make zero sense.

I’m happy to see the wasteland that is Terminal 2 go, but I’m curious how difficult it’s going to be to shuffle all those flights to Terminal 5 in the interim. If you’re flying UA, and had a tight connection from T1 to T5, you’d have no chance making it.

If you fly UA, do you like the look/feel of their revamped “comfort living” gates at SFO and IAH? I’m guessing that would be coming to a revamped terminal at ORD.

Curious what improvements you guys/gals would make.

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2018, 05:25:55 AM »
Express Train to the loop. Even if you do not go to O’Hare much, convenient reliable transportation to the loop would get a lot of traffic off the Kennedy. Everyone wants that.

Convenient/reliable = see the train Hong Kong has to their airport, which is what is proposed ... 20 minutes from the loop to the terminals not that unbelievably inconvenient O’Hare L station they currently have.  Enter the train at one end and during the 20 minute ride, check bag and go through security on the train, exit the other end of the train at the terminal steps from the gates and/or the clubs/amenities.

Even if you live in the burbs and will use the proposed western entrance, getting the loop crowd out of your life, and out of your security line and check-in, is a big win for you.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2018, 05:29:21 AM by Tugg Speedman »

JWags85

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2995
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2018, 06:21:25 AM »
Express Train to the loop. Even if you do not go to O’Hare much, convenient reliable transportation to the loop would get a lot of traffic off the Kennedy. Everyone wants that.

Convenient/reliable = see the train Hong Kong has to their airport, which is what is proposed ... 20 minutes from the loop to the terminals not that unbelievably inconvenient O’Hare L station they currently have.  Enter the train at one end and during the 20 minute ride, check bag and go through security on the train, exit the other end of the train at the terminal steps from the gates and/or the clubs/amenities.

Even if you live in the burbs and will use the proposed western entrance, getting the loop crowd out of your life, and out of your security line and check-in, is a big win for you.

Funny enough, I’m typing this from the Airport Express in HK. Fantastic train, very convenient. Just to clarify for those unfamiliar, there is not security and check-in on the train, that would be quite a great addition, your statement made it seem like there is.  But it does drop you a 2 min walk from the check in counters and security, not in the bowels of the airport like the Blue Line currently does.

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2018, 07:04:52 AM »
Funny enough, I’m typing this from the Airport Express in HK. Fantastic train, very convenient. Just to clarify for those unfamiliar, there is not security and check-in on the train, that would be quite a great addition, your statement made it seem like there is.  But it does drop you a 2 min walk from the check in counters and security, not in the bowels of the airport like the Blue Line currently does.

Yes, thanks for the clarification, I did word it poorly. 

As you noted the HK train stops and the door open or what would be the equivalent of the airport terminal monorail at O'hare.  The HK airport train is probably the most convenient airport train in the world.

The Chicago version proposed has suggested the check-in and security feature I described (so they were taking HK train model to the next level).  The Chicago proposal would stop at the equivalent of the food court between H and K in the American terminal (or the underground walkway in the United terminal).

Super convenient for those coming from the loop.  And, again, if you are not coming from the loop, to get that many people out of your line is a big win for you too.

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8082
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2018, 07:08:51 AM »
I haven't been to O'Hare more than a handful of times in the last decade. I travel a lot, but from Midway whenever possible. We live closer to O'Hare, but from driveway to the the gate, it is quicker to get to Midway.

I hope to be out of the Chicago area long before this project really gets underway. It sounds like it's going to be a road  construction  nightmare and a graft magnet, and I don't want to be on the hook for paying for it.
Have some patience, FFS.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8468
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2018, 09:27:53 AM »
I haven't been to O'Hare more than a handful of times in the last decade. I travel a lot, but from Midway whenever possible. We live closer to O'Hare, but from driveway to the the gate, it is quicker to get to Midway.

I hope to be out of the Chicago area long before this project really gets underway. It sounds like it's going to be a road  construction  nightmare and a graft magnet, and I don't want to be on the hook for paying for it.

You fly MDW because of Southwest. MDW is not easier to access than O'Hare. Cicero is hardly an arterial capable of handling the traffic.

muwarrior69

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5147
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2018, 09:31:19 AM »
I haven't been to O'Hare more than a handful of times in the last decade. I travel a lot, but from Midway whenever possible. We live closer to O'Hare, but from driveway to the the gate, it is quicker to get to Midway.

I hope to be out of the Chicago area long before this project really gets underway. It sounds like it's going to be a road  construction  nightmare and a graft magnet, and I don't want to be on the hook for paying for it.

Retiring to Milwaukee, eh?

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8082
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2018, 09:35:42 AM »
You fly MDW because of Southwest. MDW is not easier to access than O'Hare. Cicero is hardly an arterial capable of handling the traffic.

I don't go anywhere near Cicero. I park at an offsite place that is west of there. The person at the booth tells me where the closest open parking spot, their shuttle follows my car there,  the driver handles my luggage, and I get to the terminal quicker than either slogging through O'Hare's parking garage or using their remote lot.

And for the record, I have taken plenty of non-Southwest flights out of Midway.  The only time I go to O'Hare is if it is my only realistic option.  I have flown out of Milwaukee rather than dealing with that godforsaken airport.
Have some patience, FFS.

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8082
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2018, 09:36:00 AM »
Retiring to Milwaukee, eh?

It's one of the options.
Have some patience, FFS.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8468
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2018, 10:02:46 PM »
I don't go anywhere near Cicero. I park at an offsite place that is west of there. The person at the booth tells me where the closest open parking spot, their shuttle follows my car there,  the driver handles my luggage, and I get to the terminal quicker than either slogging through O'Hare's parking garage or using their remote lot.

And for the record, I have taken plenty of non-Southwest flights out of Midway.  The only time I go to O'Hare is if it is my only realistic option.  I have flown out of Milwaukee rather than dealing with that godforsaken airport.

There are those same services at O'Hare, about a dozen total. They'll valet, put your bags on the shuttle and drop you off. So if you're closer to ORD, how is that same service at MDW saving you that much time?

I understand bitching about ORD is/was a cool thing to do, but realistically what's so godforsaken about it?

In the last year, I've flown out of ORD, MDW, RSW, SFO and IAH. I'll take ORD over all of them, and Milwaukee is my closest airport.

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8082
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2018, 10:08:29 PM »
There are those same services at O'Hare, about a dozen total. They'll valet, put your bags on the shuttle and drop you off. So if you're closer to ORD, how is that same service at MDW saving you that much time?

I understand bitching about ORD is/was a cool thing to do, but realistically what's so godforsaken about it?

In the last year, I've flown out of ORD, MDW, RSW, SFO and IAH. I'll take ORD over all of them, and Milwaukee is my closest airport.

I suppose you could come to my house and go to each airport and see what I am talking about.  Or take my word for it.
Have some patience, FFS.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8468
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #11 on: February 27, 2018, 10:10:46 PM »
I suppose you could come to my house and go to each airport and see what I am talking about.  Or take my word for it.

Google Maps is pretty, prettay accurate.

ZiggysFryBoy

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5115
  • MEDITERRANEAN TACOS!
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #12 on: February 27, 2018, 11:07:48 PM »
I suppose you could come to my house and go to each airport and see what I am talking about.  Or take my word for it.

You really don't want PTM at your house.   Hide the silver, if ya know what I mean.

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8468
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2018, 12:03:59 AM »
You really don't want PTM at your house.   Hide the silver, if ya know what I mean.

Man, silver is STRUGGLING lately.

NorthernDancerColt

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 760
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2018, 05:14:54 AM »
Zenyatta has a lot....a lot... of ground to make up. She gets there from here she’d be a super horse......what’s this.....Zenyatta hooked to the grandstand side....Zenyatta flying on the outside....this....is...un-belieeeeeevable!...looked impossible at the top of the stretch...

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12310
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2018, 08:22:33 AM »
It's one of the options.

Love Milwaukee, but except for about 4 months a year the weather sucks.


Benny B

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5969
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2018, 09:26:02 AM »
My wishlist for ORD:

1) Free & reliable wi-fi throughout the terminals.
2) Upgraded seating areas with power/USB ports in more locations (or at least 110 AC outlets that actually work).
3) Floor to ceiling dividers in the shiitters.  And better lighting.

It's a short list because frankly, ORD is fine for me.... I am AAL-Gold with over 400k lifetime miles, i.e. I fly a lot and have been to/through a lot of airports.  In fact, looking at the map in my office, I've been through airports in at least 27 states, two possessions (SJU & STT), three countries (YYX, SNN and LHR) and Waukegan.  In all, that number's upwards of 50 different airports.

The worst experience I've ever had was Miami, but that had nothing to do with the airport... I can't quite recall where exactly I had my best experience, but it was a small regional where I walked out of the gate, walked 50 feet through TSA, another 50 to the Avis counter and another 50 feet to the door where my rental car was literally parked across the street... 98% of airports can't have that.

That said, I'm a business traveler... I park in the $40/day garage at ORD (once I even got to park in the spot right next to the door going into the T3 skywalk), I know where my TSA PreCheck line is, I know what time of day (and day of week) to book my flights so I'm not fighting crowds (never on a Saturday morning), I can go through priority lanes if my line is too long, I know which bathrooms are the cleanest, I know which vendors are the friendliest, I know which food is the best, I know where the lottery stand run by veterans is, and I know where I can get my Oakley solution refilled.  ORD is a much different experience for a leisure traveler, a through-traveler, or an international visitor.

I went through LAS once... waited in security for over two hours, but my flight was delayed, so I was one of the few who left LAS in good fortune, i.e. it would have been a much different memory if I had missed my flight.  Likewise (same trip, actually), said flight connected through ATL...  it's pretty hard to impartially judge an airport when you see the entire C terminal in less than 10 minutes.

What I really hate - and probably where I judge my airport experience the most - is car rental, specifically, having to go to a rental counter and/or having to wait for a shuttle... I rather walk (or tram) right to my car, look at my name on a board, find my car and go.  As far as the int'l hubs, airports like MSP, MCO and CLT win while the likes of SAN, DEN, and IAH lose.  DFW and ORD would go on the latter, but since I never rent cars from either, by default DEN isn't as high as ORD on my list (see what I did there), even though I'm sure DEN is much higher on everyone else's lists (did it again).

tl;dr - Airport comparisons are probably at their highest value when sitting on a toilet in an airport bathroom with an empty TP roll.  Everyone's situation is different, and whatever they do with ORD, I only hope it allows me to challenge my record door to door times (currently at 45 minutes front door to other side of TSA, 39 minutes from touchdown to front door).  If they add amenities at the expense of time/efficiency, then I'm going to hate it even though it might be better for 95% of everyone else.
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

LloydsLegs

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1433
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2018, 09:36:11 AM »
I use O'Hare for American and Midway for Southwest.  Occasionally will fly United out of O'Hare.  Live right between the two.

I find both airports incredibly easy to use, largely because I NEVER have to connect - You can get a direct flight from Chicago to almost anywhere- it is one of the most undervalued parts of living here.  Southwest, AA or United can get you anywhere in the US, and United, AA and the International airlines can get you almost anywhere in the world in one flight. 

I can take an Uber or suburban cab for $30, or, if I have a 1 to 3 day trip, park for $35 to $100 on site.  Takes me at most 40 minutes to get to either, but usually 25.  (Chick--I am totally with you on Cicero--I would never take Cicero either--come in from the west is right - Pershing to Central for me every time, but don't tell anybody!).  The use TSA precheck or status bumps to avoid long security.

I think ORD would absolutely suck if I lived in Green Bay (like my in laws, who on more than one occasion have had to stay with us b/c of missed connections) or another city that has to connect through ORD.  That is the biggest problem--trying to navigate unreliable connections.  But when O'Hare is your "terminal destination," IMO it is easy to deal with. 

I will say that I miss the old days at Midway, when you could park at 6:00 am across the street from the terminal for $10, be at your gate 10 minutes later, on a 7:00am Southwest flight to Louisville, come back at 5:30 that night and be home by 6:15.

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8082
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2018, 09:46:39 AM »
I use O'Hare for American and Midway for Southwest.  Occasionally will fly United out of O'Hare.  Live right between the two.

I find both airports incredibly easy to use, largely because I NEVER have to connect - You can get a direct flight from Chicago to almost anywhere- it is one of the most undervalued parts of living here.  Southwest, AA or United can get you anywhere in the US, and United, AA and the International airlines can get you almost anywhere in the world in one flight. 

I can take an Uber or suburban cab for $30, or, if I have a 1 to 3 day trip, park for $35 to $100 on site.  Takes me at most 40 minutes to get to either, but usually 25.  (Chick--I am totally with you on Cicero--I would never take Cicero either--come in from the west is right - Pershing to Central for me every time, but don't tell anybody!).  The use TSA precheck or status bumps to avoid long security.

I think ORD would absolutely suck if I lived in Green Bay (like my in laws, who on more than one occasion have had to stay with us b/c of missed connections) or another city that has to connect through ORD.  That is the biggest problem--trying to navigate unreliable connections.  But when O'Hare is your "terminal destination," IMO it is easy to deal with. 

I will say that I miss the old days at Midway, when you could park at 6:00 am across the street from the terminal for $10, be at your gate 10 minutes later, on a 7:00am Southwest flight to Louisville, come back at 5:30 that night and be home by 6:15.

Another plus for Midway - flights are rarely delayed unless it is weather-related.  And if the weather is in Chicago, it is much less likely to be delayed.  I have been on business trips where everyone else flew out of O'Hare and I took Midway, and even though our Friday evening flights were scheduled about the same time, I always got home first.  I even taunted them at times while waiting for my plane to unload, and they were still sitting in Charlotte or Philly.
Have some patience, FFS.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2018, 10:12:55 AM »
Actually I don't like the Denver airport at all.  It's too far out of town if you are flying there.  Switching planes there is fine if your gates are close.  Otherwise you're walking miles to get anywhere. 

StillAWarrior

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4213
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2018, 10:44:51 AM »
I can't quite recall where exactly I had my best experience, but it was a small regional where I walked out of the gate, walked 50 feet through TSA, another 50 to the Avis counter and another 50 feet to the door where my rental car was literally parked across the street... 98% of airports can't have that.

Several years ago, I had to go to Fort Wayne a bunch of times.  It was like that and it was fantastic.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2018, 11:00:46 AM by StillAWarrior »
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

jficke13

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1372
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2018, 11:12:59 AM »
Yeah count me in the ORD could totally be worse camp.

Highspeed rail connection to the loop crowd would be a huge addition. Anything to relieve the congestion on the Kennedy. That stretch of highway is hell.

That HK train thing sounds pretty slick. Especially with the fantasy land of check-in/TSA on board. Getting rail-access travelers out of the general TSA lines would be great for the drive-in/drop-off crowd.

I've mostly flown UA out of ORD, and had 0 problems checking in, getting through TSA, getting to the gate. Flying back from Munich recently was a hell of a whole different story (aprx 4 hours from setting foot at the airport to the gate... so much for fabled German efficiency).

I'd be really interested in hearing pilots chime in. I know that there's logistics stuff that might be worth pouring $$$ into that the passenger never sees. Frankly, give me a smoothly-running airport over wi-fi.



GooooMarquette

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9489
  • We got this.
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2018, 05:42:54 PM »

The worst experience I've ever had was Miami, but that had nothing to do with the airport... I can't quite recall where exactly I had my best experience, but it was a small regional where I walked out of the gate, walked 50 feet through TSA, another 50 to the Avis counter and another 50 feet to the door where my rental car was literally parked across the street... 98% of airports can't have that.


My home airport of RST is like that...and it's a thing of beauty when it works.  I live about 5 minutes away, and once left home 20 minutes before an on-time departure...and still made the flight with time to spare.  And when I get back after a long day of traveling, I'm home about 10 minutes after we get to the gate.

But there are plenty of downsides.  If your flight out is delayed, there is NOTHING to do.  You have to change planes to get anywhere other than MSP, DTW, ORD and ATL.  And the little planes they fly here are always the first canceled when the weather gets sketchy at a hub, so I have spent many nights in a hub city due to cancellations, or ridden many shuttle buses to MSP to catch a later flight to my destination.

Interestingly, my worst experience was in Miami too.  I lived in Chicago at the time and had a convenient nonstop from ORD to MIA.  We flew after work so it was about 10pm when we got there.  We figured we'd get out quickly at that time of the night, so had made reservations about halfway down the keys, figuring we'd get there by midnight.  But we got to the car rental counter and they were out of rental cars even though we had a reservation.  Several people were ahead of us already waiting, so we ended up having to wait a few hours until a car arrived and we got out.  Needless to say, we were kinda tired when we got to our hotel around 4 am.

God, I hate MIA.


ATL MU Warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2810
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2018, 06:12:59 PM »
Several years ago, I had to go to Fort Wayne a bunch of times.  It was like that and it was fantastic.
I fly in/out of ATL 30-40 times a year.  I have reached level of familiarity rivaling Benny & ORD, and it's really quite amazing how well ATL operates for the volume of traffic it handles.  I haven't been seriously delayed in several years/a couple hundred flights...just jinxed myself I am sure.  I fly only Delta, probably not quite as smooth for other airlines. 

nyg

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
Re: ORD Expansion/Modernization
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2018, 07:01:35 PM »
My home airport of RST is like that...and it's a thing of beauty when it works.  I live about 5 minutes away, and once left home 20 minutes before an on-time departure...and still made the flight with time to spare.  And when I get back after a long day of traveling, I'm home about 10 minutes after we get to the gate.

But there are plenty of downsides.  If your flight out is delayed, there is NOTHING to do.  You have to change planes to get anywhere other than MSP, DTW, ORD and ATL.  And the little planes they fly here are always the first canceled when the weather gets sketchy at a hub, so I have spent many nights in a hub city due to cancellations, or ridden many shuttle buses to MSP to catch a later flight to my destination.

Interestingly, my worst experience was in Miami too.  I lived in Chicago at the time and had a convenient nonstop from ORD to MIA.  We flew after work so it was about 10pm when we got there.  We figured we'd get out quickly at that time of the night, so had made reservations about halfway down the keys, figuring we'd get there by midnight.  But we got to the car rental counter and they were out of rental cars even though we had a reservation.  Several people were ahead of us already waiting, so we ended up having to wait a few hours until a car arrived and we got out.  Needless to say, we were kinda tired when we got to our hotel around 4 am.

God, I hate MIA.

Interesting.  I had to attend a funeral last week in Alden, Mn ( Seriously, I really don’t know how any human being could live out there).  I had a connection in ATL and then to RST.  One of, if not the smallest airports I have ever seen.  Believe like 8 flights out a day.  After funeral, arrived 45 minutes before flight, one minute thru TSA and one minute to gate.  Unreal. 

ATL is busy, but very efficient and can’t complain about Delta.

 

feedback