collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

Bill Scholl Retiring by Uncle Rico
[Today at 06:14:45 AM]


Crean vs Buzz vs Wojo vs Shaka by brewcity77
[May 07, 2024, 11:31:29 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by MU82
[May 07, 2024, 10:45:05 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Skatastrophy
[May 07, 2024, 07:21:58 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by Dawson Rental
[May 07, 2024, 06:51:10 PM]


MU appearance in The Athletic's college hoops mailbag by lawdog77
[May 07, 2024, 05:44:34 PM]


2025 Bracketology by tower912
[May 07, 2024, 04:14:43 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Davidson  (Read 16426 times)

Aughnanure

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2860
Re: Davidson
« Reply #25 on: March 17, 2013, 07:21:08 PM »
Read Butler's board. They're all complaining about ESPN and everyone picking Bucknell.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13803
Re: Davidson
« Reply #26 on: March 17, 2013, 07:22:01 PM »
They shoot free throws really well, best in nation.

But don't turn teams over much(thank you) and suck at rebounding.

Use our size. Work the paint. Get fouls, use depth, rebound.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

Tums Festival

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1284
Re: Davidson
« Reply #27 on: March 17, 2013, 07:22:27 PM »
This game isn't a "toss up."  If MU plays their game, they win.

I said "close to a toss up." Not a gimme by any means, we'll have to earn it.
"Every day ends with a Tums festival!"

PGsHeroes32

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 13803
Re: Davidson
« Reply #28 on: March 17, 2013, 07:22:57 PM »
Read Butler's board. They're all complaining about ESPN and everyone picking Bucknell.

If that's the case UCLA fans must be going bezerk. I havn't seen them picked to beat the gophers yet.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

🏀

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8468
Re: Davidson
« Reply #29 on: March 17, 2013, 07:39:43 PM »
If that's the case UCLA fans must be going bezerk. I havn't seen them picked to beat the gophers yet.

UCLA did lose their second best player.

downtown85

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1386
  • Ad majoram Dei gloriam.
Re: Davidson
« Reply #30 on: March 17, 2013, 07:43:53 PM »
We gotta take this one at a time but Davidson has only beaten 1 team in the tournament: Montana.  

They haven't beaten anyone.  http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rpi/_/teamId/2166

I think as long as we don't take them for granted, it should be a W.

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rpi/_/sort/RPI/teamId/269

patso

  • Registered User
  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 403
Re: Davidson
« Reply #31 on: March 17, 2013, 07:46:45 PM »
I would like to get an early lead which our team does not usuallly do

ZiggysFryBoy

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5115
  • MEDITERRANEAN TACOS!
Re: Davidson
« Reply #32 on: March 17, 2013, 07:49:35 PM »
I would like to get an early lead which our team does not usuallly do

Except Nd in the BET

statnik

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 399
Re: Davidson
« Reply #33 on: March 17, 2013, 07:55:39 PM »
Considering this is a #3 seed vs. #14 seed, this game is close to a toss up. Not to over simplify, but if "good" Marquette shows up we win, if "bad" Marquette shows up we lose. We've been Jekyll & Hyde all season.

I agree, but we're in the minority.  I have to call em as I see em.  Last year I felt we were generally worthy of our 3 seed.  This year, not as much.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Davidson
« Reply #34 on: March 17, 2013, 08:01:28 PM »
Not a gimme by any means, we'll have to earn it.


Ya think???

patso

  • Registered User
  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 403
Re: Davidson
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2013, 08:02:26 PM »
They've been crushing their bad conference opponents

nyg

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
Re: Davidson
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2013, 08:07:32 PM »
They have a bunch of guys like ND's Connaugthn.

Defend the open three and MU breezes. 

patso

  • Registered User
  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 403
Re: Davidson
« Reply #37 on: March 17, 2013, 08:08:22 PM »
Of the 14s I would have preferred Harvard or Northwestern State but not Valpo

Tums Festival

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1284
Re: Davidson
« Reply #38 on: March 17, 2013, 08:33:13 PM »
"Every day ends with a Tums festival!"

Mr. Nielsen

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5454
  • Facts don't care about your feelings!
Re: Davidson
« Reply #39 on: March 17, 2013, 09:42:03 PM »
Davidson lost to UW-M?
Panthers played pretty well in that game to get the win.

Davidson played early Wednesday morning 1am our time at New Mexico, then played at Milwaukee that Saturday.
If we are all thinking alike, we're not thinking at all. It's OK to disagree. Just don't be disagreeable.
-Bill Walton

mu_hilltopper

  • Warrior
  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7417
    • https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys

TallTitan34

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9337
  • Gold N. Eagle (Ret.), Two Time SI Cover Model
    • Marquette Overload
Re: Davidson
« Reply #41 on: March 17, 2013, 10:50:55 PM »
The stats are comparable except our stats have come against a SOS of 12 and theirs against a SOS of 216.

JakeBarnes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
Re: Davidson
« Reply #42 on: March 17, 2013, 10:55:20 PM »
From what I understand is this Davidson team is the second coming of a Grant Hill-lead Duke team.  We might as well ignore everything else and just conceded the game.
Assume what I say should be in teal if it doesn't pass the smell test for you.


Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Davidson
« Reply #43 on: March 17, 2013, 11:09:40 PM »
Not sure if the Wiki is updated, but it lists MU as 1-1 in games vs. Davidson

From the Charlotte Observer

"Marquette and Davidson met twice in the 1960s but have not since then."

You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

MUfan12

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5650
Re: Davidson
« Reply #44 on: March 17, 2013, 11:12:07 PM »
Get a bit of a Holy Cross 2003 vibe from this game. Still think MU will win, but it's not a great matchup. Especially on the heels of some of the worst perimeter defense MU played all season.

77ncaachamps

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8457
  • Last of the Warrior Class
Re: Davidson
« Reply #45 on: March 17, 2013, 11:39:31 PM »
Well, conference-wise they whooped the second best team in their conference twice.

With only six losses on he year, this team sounds like they're playing extremely well team ball and are cohesive.

We need to pressure, create TOs, hit our FTs, draw them into foul trouble, and AVOID the relaxing D that allows open three shooters.

If I were Davidson, I'd zone MU, run high screens, drive and kick for the three, and run the pick n roll especially when DG hedges (he can't recover quickly).
SS Marquette

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Davidson
« Reply #46 on: March 17, 2013, 11:46:49 PM »
Well, conference-wise they whooped the second best team in their conference twice.

With only six losses on he year, this team sounds like they're playing extremely well team ball and are cohesive.

We need to pressure, create TOs, hit our FTs, draw them into foul trouble, and AVOID the relaxing D that allows open three shooters.

If I were Davidson, I'd zone MU, run high screens, drive and kick for the three, and run the pick n roll especially when DG hedges (he can't recover quickly).

They absolutely will have to zone us.  They only go seven deep with no real backups at the 4 and 5.  Keep running fresh bodies at them, and feed the post to get their two bigs into foul trouble.  Those two are their only double digit scorers.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2013, 11:48:27 PM by LittleMurs »
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

MUMountin

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 807
Re: Davidson
« Reply #47 on: March 18, 2013, 12:58:35 AM »
They absolutely will have to zone us.  They only go seven deep with no real backups at the 4 and 5.  Keep running fresh bodies at them, and feed the post to get their two bigs into foul trouble.  Those two are their only double digit scorers.

According to their message boards, they will occasionally use a 2-3 zone, but have been killed on the boards when they do.  They don't expect a steady zone--primarily man defense with some possessions in zone. 

Also, it sounds like they had another senior big--Clint Mann-who saw decent minutes in non-conference that got a concussion in January and has not returned since.  Looks like he was their sixth man (no pun intended) and they have little frontcourt depth behind him.  But, they have won 16 games without him--15 in conference, one against Montana.

Sharpie

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: Davidson
« Reply #48 on: March 18, 2013, 06:01:30 AM »
Is Davidson a good and cohesive team? Yes. They do not have the athletes or the depth that we do. Just because they played a few good teams early in the year doesn't mean a thing. We absolutely should beat these guys. Their board seems to believe we are very unimpressive and that they should win this game. But I'm sorry there is no reason why we shouldn't run away with this one. Are we capable of dumping the bed, absolutely. I'm confident buzz and the boys will be ready and all this bullsh and the commentators picking this as an upset should light a fire under this team. They'll be ready. Marquette by 10. This is not me underestimating Davidson but screw them and run into the second round on a high note.

damuts222

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 858
    • Gangnam makes me loco
Re: Davidson
« Reply #49 on: March 18, 2013, 07:17:06 AM »
Quote
Well, conference-wise they whooped the second best team in their conference twice.

  Yea a 15-16 Appalachian State team was 2nd in conference who almost beat them last week.  Regardless of stats we need to go down low early and often and control the boards.
Twitta Tracka of the Year Award Recipient 2016