Another Prophecy

[Dawson Rental]

The youngsters won't get this one, but I am posting it anyway...

A clear ripoff of the beginning of the Dick Van Dyke Show.

[T-Bone]

Hologram Al, Ghost of Rick, and Ners visited him in this vision.

[brewcity77]

Hologram Al, Ghost of Rick, and Ners Tower913 visited him in this vision.

FIFY

[warriorchick]

A clear ripoff of the beginning of the Dick Van Dyke Show.

Not quite, Grasshopper.

[T-Bone]

FIFY

Just wait for brewcity78.

[naginiF]

True story from today on Spring Break:

**Scene: naginiF family oddly decides to go to the Black Hills for Spring Break.  Today they drove to Devils Tower.  Fade in hiking around the monument as Pa naginiF spots a guy in a Bucks hat.......

naginiF:  you a big Bucks fan?
Guy:  you know it.  don't have season tickets but go a few times a year....we're gonna make some noise soon.
n:  how about Marquette?
G:  not so much but Wojo is bringing me around.  i love that guy

** fade out during some small talk

I thought nothing of it until getting back to the airbnb and reading Milwarriorkee's latest (?) prophecy.  clearly this Milwaukee resident was sent to tell me that Marquette will meet Duke i.e. Devils Tower in the round of 32

[Herman Cain]

Literally the first person I spoke to after we were announced in the tournament was a random gal who was a South Carolina grad. She said we would likely win.

[T-Bone]

naginiF at dinner the net night.

[Milwarriorkee]

This one was not as clear an my November 2016 Vision that led me to correctly predict the 2017 Big East Tournament winner. 

My best interpretation:

Marquette will win NO LESS than two (2) games in this year's tournament
One game will have historical significance. 
A major player will not play
A game will hinge on an ambiguous rule interpretation

Doubt me at your own risk.  Some will never learn.

[brewcity77]

This one was not as clear an my November 2016 Vision that led me to correctly predict the 2017 Big East Tournament winner. 

My best interpretation:

Marquette will win NO LESS than two (2) games in this year's tournament
One game will have historical significance. 
A major player will not play
A game will hinge on an ambiguous rule interpretation

Doubt me at your own risk.  Some will never learn.

Safe to say you'll take all Marquette teams into account for the first, the second could refer to any game in either the men's or women's tournament (such as the first UConn game which will have historical significance by extending the nation's longest winning streak), any major player missing any game (or simply saying Syracuse and Indiana not making the dance are a major "player" not playing), and I'm pretty sure every tourney has the fourth as well.

So basically...all you're saying in the men and women will account for two wins. Wow. Bold.

[MUMountin]

This is amazing.  Waiting with bated breath.

[Milwarriorkee]

Safe to say you'll take all Marquette teams into account for the first, the second could refer to any game in either the men's or women's tournament (such as the first UConn game which will have historical significance by extending the nation's longest winning streak), any major player missing any game (or simply saying Syracuse and Indiana not making the dance are a major "player" not playing), and I'm pretty sure every tourney has the fourth as well.

So basically...all you're saying in the men and women will account for two wins. Wow. Bold.

Posts like this will lead you to more shame and embarrassment.  Sadly, some are unable to learn.  I will clarify that the first statement (no less than two games won) undoubtedly refers to the Marquette Men's Basketball Team.

[LloydsLegs]

Not quite, Grasshopper.

Speaking of old TV references...

[brewcity77]

Posts like this will lead you to more shame and embarrassment.  Sadly, some are unable to learn.  I will clarify that the first statement (no less than two games won) undoubtedly refers to the Marquette Men's Basketball Team.

Undoubtedly.

I have no problem with you being right, I just want to make sure you aren't shifting the goalposts after the fact. Willing to clarify any of the other statements, or am I pretty much dead on regarding those?

[GWSwarrior]

This one was not as clear an my November 2016 Vision that led me to correctly predict the 2017 Big East Tournament winner. 

My best interpretation:

Marquette will win NO LESS than two (2) games in this year's tournament
One game will have historical significance. 
A major player will not play
A game will hinge on an ambiguous rule interpretation

Doubt me at your own risk.  Some will never learn.

You needed a vision to predict that Nova would win the BET? I think you should get somebody else to handle your finances from now on

[brewcity77]

You needed a vision to predict that Nova would win the BET? I think you should get somebody else to handle your finances from now on

His vision was picking Marquette to win the BET, and he claimed that came true with the women's win over DePaul.

[Milwarriorkee]

Undoubtedly.

I have no problem with you being right, I just want to make sure you aren't shifting the goalposts after the fact. Willing to clarify any of the other statements, or am I pretty much dead on regarding those?

My belief is that all of the statements pertain to Marquette Men's Basketball Team in this year's tournament.  But there was some slight ambiguity as to the other statements, so I can only state the first one as a fact.  The Visions are never wrong.   However, my interpretation can be, so I try to be careful as to what I state as the facts that will come to pass. 

This is why in November when I told you that Marquette would win the BET, I did not qualify it with the Men's or Women's.  For those of you that believe that was a lucky guess...look back to that post and see how there was no doubt in my statement.  And ask, when is the last time EITHER Marquette team won a conference tournament?  The Vision showed me what would come, and I simply relayed the information to those I thought would value it.  It did come to pass many months later, and still some doubt and ridicule.  Shame.   

[T-Bone]

BRB, gotta adjust some brackets. 

(Where's Dark Glasses with his predictions, btw?)

[GWSwarrior]

My belief is that all of the statements pertain to Marquette Men's Basketball Team in this year's tournament.  But there was some slight ambiguity as to the other statements, so I can only state the first one as a fact.  The Visions are never wrong.   However, my interpretation can be, so I try to be careful as to what I state as the facts that will come to pass. 

This is why in November when I told you that Marquette would win the BET, I did not qualify it with the Men's or Women's.  For those of you that believe that was a lucky guess...look back to that post and see how there was no doubt in my statement.  And ask, when is the last time EITHER Marquette team won a conference tournament?  The Vision showed me what would come, and I simply relayed the information to those I thought would value it.  It did come to pass many months later, and still some doubt and ridicule.  Shame.

I'm glad your parents gave you back your interweb privileges

[GOO]

Am I to assume that this year's tournament refers only the 2017 NCAA's or does it refer to the 2017 NCAA's and the 2017 Maui Invitationals later this year?

[Schmidtyfactor]

Or Beer Pong Tournament? Or Ski-ball? Badmitton? Bouncy House last man standing? king of the hill?

The Tournaments this men's team could win are endless!!

[Milwarriorkee]

Am I to assume that this year's tournament refers only the 2017 NCAA's or does it refer to the 2017 NCAA's and the 2017 Maui Invitationals later this year?

I had not considered this.  My belief was that it referred to the NCAA tournament, but it is possible.  Remember I am only the messenger. 

[Milwarriorkee]

Or Beer Pong Tournament? Or Ski-ball? Badmitton? Bouncy House last man standing? king of the hill?

The Tournaments this men's team could win are endless!!

No.  Men's basketball only.

[thebigjake]

OK dude, I just bet my house, retirement accounts and kid's college funds on MU winning the next two games.

I sure hope you are correct, but you seem super reliable.  So...

[Loose Cannon]

My belief is that all of the statements pertain to Marquette Men's Basketball Team in this year's tournament.  But there was some slight ambiguity as to the other statements, so I can only state the first one as a fact.  The Visions are never wrong.   However, my interpretation can be, so I try to be careful as to what I state as the facts that will come to pass. 

This is why in November when I told you that Marquette would win the BET, I did not qualify it with the Men's or Women's.  For those of you that believe that was a lucky guess...look back to that post and see how there was no doubt in my statement.  And ask, when is the last time EITHER Marquette team won a conference tournament?  The Vision showed me what would come, and I simply relayed the information to those I thought would value it.  It did come to pass many months later, and still some doubt and ridicule.  Shame.

Could you give some scores, I'd to make some bets.