Scholarship table
True cupcakes are 4-10Good non-con teams are 8-2 (including both Pitt and SMU until we figure that out)Through this morning.
TAMUI do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.
Alas, Vandy lost to Bucknell on Monday night at home. http://www.espn.com/ncb/recap/_/gameId/400910821
Thanks for the update...nice to see it all in one place.But it's turning out to be a downer schedule. Can't afford to lose to any of the teams except the two we lost to and UW. Even Vandy and Ga are uninspiring when you look at it. It's all about not losing to way inferior teams and the Conference now.Beating UW would put some pep in it.
It's really not bad.And while I don't think georgia is that good idk how you can call them a downer so farAt Clemson and neutral to top 10(or better) Kansas?
We have the worst SOS in the Big East. Our losses aren't bad, but our wins certainly aren't a good resume builder.
Are you looking at RPI? It's especially useless this early in the season, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.
I still believe it is who you beat that matters. Home games against teams 150+ are expected to be wins and only matter if they turn into bad losses. Generally, all road wins are good wins. That is why I argued our non conference schedule was not strong. It is tougher than last year, but I do not believe replacing 300+ teams with 200+ teams in the end makes a difference when the committee is reviewing your resume with an emphasis on your top 50 record.
You keep saying this despite the fact that everyone keeps pointing out you are wrong. Playing 200+ teams OOC most certainly makes your resume better than 300+ teams. And everyone plays these teams. Your ideas about how the committee selects teams are about 30 years out of date right now.