collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

NIL Future by Tyler COLEk
[April 18, 2024, 10:58:58 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by Herman Cain
[April 18, 2024, 10:58:45 PM]


2024 NCAA Tournament Thread by MU82
[April 18, 2024, 09:51:16 PM]


2024 Coaching Carousel by WhiteTrash
[April 18, 2024, 09:34:43 PM]


Maximilian Langenfeld by TSmith34, Inc.
[April 18, 2024, 09:22:20 PM]


MU Gear by TallTitan34
[April 18, 2024, 07:27:40 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by Uncle Rico
[April 18, 2024, 05:33:25 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: X's and O's  (Read 17289 times)

BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5857
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #75 on: July 30, 2016, 10:15:54 AM »
Huh?

Not sure what you're confused about.

If we're considering DeRozan a star, and a lot of people do, then Wes can't be far off. Wes is a better player. Better Efg%, better defender, similar rebounding and assist rates.

Loose Cannon

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2845
  • Voltaire says Hi
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #76 on: July 30, 2016, 10:19:27 AM »
TWO WORDS:  SACAR ANIM!  HE WILL BE THAT PLAYER FOR US NEXT SEASON AND NO DOUBT WILL BE A SOLID NBA CONTRIBUTOR IN FEW YEARS.  THE BIG QUESTION IS WILL THE TRANSFORMATIVE SEASON SACAR IS ABOUT TO HAVE ONLY BENEFIT HIM PERSONALLY OR THE ENTIRE TEAM.   THA'S THE $1M QUESTION.


Just maybe he's starting to crack that Egg shell.  He had 32 against Scion Dental on July 22 and he's averaging 7.7 rebounds in the 3 games he played.

Even though its water downed play,  better to be doing good things than not doing anything.  Stay Tuned.
" Love is Space and Time measured by the Heart. "  M Proust

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17526
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #77 on: July 30, 2016, 12:47:35 PM »
Not sure what you're confused about.

If we're considering DeRozan a star, and a lot of people do, then Wes can't be far off. Wes is a better player. Better Efg%, better defender, similar rebounding and assist rates.

What?  I love Wes.  But Wes is nowhere near DeMar DeRozan.  Wes's best year was 16.4/3.5/2.4 while shooting 44% from the field and 39% from 3.  Outside of DeRozan's rookie year, his worst season is 16.7/3.3/2.0 while shooting 42% from the field and 26% from 3.  He's averaging 18.1/3.9/2.6 for his career and is 3 years younger than Wes.

Wes's highest defensive win shares season is 2.2 while DeRozan has had seasons of 3.0 and 2.4 (and they come in 2 of the past 3 years).  Offensively Wes's best season is 6.3 while DeRozan's is 7.0.

DeRozan was 24, 5, and 4 this year.  That is a star.  And sorry, but Wes will never come close to those kinds of numbers.

There's not even a comparison here.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2016, 12:52:52 PM by wadesworld »
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

WarriorFan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1638
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #78 on: July 30, 2016, 06:47:38 PM »
JFB is a "star".
Wes is a solid NBA starter.  He would start on almost every NBA team pre-injury, and if he comes back strong, will continue to have that status.
Jae is a serviceable NBA starter.  He would not start on every team, but would get serious minutes on any team.

as compared to...
Wade - Superstar
Novak - career journeyman / role player
Diener - Serviceable NBA reserve
Tony Smith - Serviceable NBA reserve
Buycks - fringe NBA'er
Lazar/Blue - cup of tea guys
"The meaning of life isn't gnashing our bicuspids over what comes after death but tasting the tiny moments that come before it."

BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5857
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #79 on: July 30, 2016, 09:23:09 PM »
What?  I love Wes.  But Wes is nowhere near DeMar DeRozan.  Wes's best year was 16.4/3.5/2.4 while shooting 44% from the field and 39% from 3.  Outside of DeRozan's rookie year, his worst season is 16.7/3.3/2.0 while shooting 42% from the field and 26% from 3.  He's averaging 18.1/3.9/2.6 for his career and is 3 years younger than Wes.

Wes's highest defensive win shares season is 2.2 while DeRozan has had seasons of 3.0 and 2.4 (and they come in 2 of the past 3 years).  Offensively Wes's best season is 6.3 while DeRozan's is 7.0.

DeRozan was 24, 5, and 4 this year.  That is a star.  And sorry, but Wes will never come close to those kinds of numbers.

There's not even a comparison here.

On my phone so I'll answer the rest of this later, but the only reason DeRozans scoring numbers are higher is because he takes 7 more shots per game. Lower Fg% ,3P%, FT% for DeMar every year. And barely higher in MPG. His usage being higher doesn't make him a better play.

Win shares I don't know a ton about so I can't respond to it.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22871
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #80 on: July 30, 2016, 10:44:32 PM »
On my phone so I'll answer the rest of this later, but the only reason DeRozans scoring numbers are higher is because he takes 7 more shots per game. Lower Fg% ,3P%, FT% for DeMar every year. And barely higher in MPG. His usage being higher doesn't make him a better play.

Win shares I don't know a ton about so I can't respond to it.

DeRozan gets more of his team's shots because he is one of his team's stars, no?
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #81 on: July 31, 2016, 01:07:29 AM »
On my phone so I'll answer the rest of this later, but the only reason DeRozans scoring numbers are higher is because he takes 7 more shots per game. Lower Fg% ,3P%, FT% for DeMar every year. And barely higher in MPG. His usage being higher doesn't make him a better play.

Win shares I don't know a ton about so I can't respond to it.

I get what you are trying to say but you can't just throw usage out the window. Derozan gets more shots because he is a better player. I mean, Sacar Anim isn't a better player than Henry Ellenson even though he shot a better FG% and 3P%. Extreme example, I know but many people would put comparing Wes to DeMar in the same category. Love Wes but DeMar Derozan eats his lunch.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5857
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #82 on: July 31, 2016, 12:58:58 PM »
I get what you are trying to say but you can't just throw usage out the window. Derozan gets more shots because he is a better player. I mean, Sacar Anim isn't a better player than Henry Ellenson even though he shot a better FG% and 3P%. Extreme example, I know but many people would put comparing Wes to DeMar in the same category. Love Wes but DeMar Derozan eats his lunch.

Well, I don't necessarily agree. But I also recognize that it looks like I"m the solo minority on this topic so I will concede defeat.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12865
  • 9-9-9
Re: X's and O's
« Reply #83 on: July 31, 2016, 03:16:47 PM »
Well, I don't necessarily agree. But I also recognize that it looks like I"m the solo minority on this topic so I will concede defeat.
I prefer Wes. He played for Marquette and the other guy didn't . The other guy just takes a lot of shots.
Winning is overrated. The only time it is really important is in surgery and war.
                       ---Al McGuire

 

feedback