collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024 Coaching Carousel by WhiteTrash
[Today at 09:34:43 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by JakeBarnes
[Today at 09:27:16 PM]


Maximilian Langenfeld by TSmith34, Inc.
[Today at 09:22:20 PM]


NIL Future by PointWarrior
[Today at 09:03:13 PM]


MU Gear by TallTitan34
[Today at 07:27:40 PM]


2024 NCAA Tournament Thread by lawdog77
[Today at 07:14:12 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by Uncle Rico
[Today at 05:33:25 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: [Cracked Sidewalks] Fischer, JJJ or Cheatham Could Join Ellenson in NBA to keep MU in Top 15 NBA Factories  (Read 2430 times)

CrackedSidewalks

  • Guest
Fischer, JJJ or Cheatham Could Join Ellenson in NBA to keep MU in Top 15 NBA Factories

Value Add updated the chance of players making the NBA last night, and the odds are that at least one of three players - Luke Fischer (35%), JuJuan Johnson (21%) and/or Haanif Cheatham (16%) will join Henry Ellenson in the NBA one day. Since 2003, MU has averaged having 2.5 future NBA players on each roster - the 15th best total in the country.

In the days ahead we will be updating the historic database to indicate the last year each player appeared in the NBA. One interesting note in building this database is that steals were not as big a predictor as in the past, while rebounding, blocked shots, two-point shots and the ability to get to the line all separate future NBA players from the very good college players that do NOT make the NBA:

Average Player Performance 2003-2016OR%DR%Blk%Stl%FTRate2-pt %
1500 top players who did not make NBA3.4611.100.862.2336.3547%
Possible players6.9714.833.171.8242.3751%
Future NBA average7.0814.743.082.1742.0951%
NBA Center11.6219.816.861.6151.6555%
NBA PF9.6017.953.991.8344.1153%
NBA PG2.809.570.762.7639.4248%
NBA SF7.0114.802.662.0938.9051%
NBA SG4.6811.911.362.5436.9149%

The 1500 seasons in which a player was on the court a bit more than 80% of the time but did NOT ultimately make the NBA, resulted in the average percentages on the top line.

MU is credited for 1.63 future NBA players on the current roster (adding the percent chance each player makes it), while last year's team is credited for 0.56 with Fischer and Johnson on that team as well. If Matt Carlino were to make the jump it would add a player to 2015.

As we go back earlier, we see that MU's 2011 team had FIVE future NBA players, though only Jae Crowder and Jimmy Butler played more than a few games. The first year in the database, the 2003 Final Four team, featured only three future NBA players, but all three had extended careers.

College YrNBA Last Year or %
Ellenson, Henry 13201691%
Fischer, Luke 40201635%
Johnson, JaJuan 23201621%
Cheatham, Haanif 25201616%
Total estimated 2016 team1.63
Fischer, Luke 40201535%
Johnson, JaJuan 23201521%
Total estimated 2015 team0.56
Crowder, Jae 3220122016
Butler, Jimmy 3320112016
Crowder, Jae 3220112016
Butler, Jimmy 3320102016
Butler, Jimmy 3320092016
Matthews, Wesley 2320092016
Matthews, Wesley 2320082016
Matthews, Wesley 2320072016
Novak, Steve20062016
Matthews, Wesley20062016
Novak, Steve20052016
Novak, Steve20042016
Wade, Dwyane20032016
Novak, Steve20032016
Blue, Vander 1320132015
Blue, Vander 220122015
Blue, Vander 220112015
Buycks, Dwight 2320112015
Buycks, Dwight 2320102015
McNeal, Jerel 2220092015
McNeal, Jerel 2220082015
McNeal, Jerel 2220072015
McNeal, Jerel20062015
Johnson-Odom, Darius 120122014
Johnson-Odom, Darius 120112014
Johnson-Odom, Darius 120102014
Hayward, Lazar 3220102013
Hayward, Lazar 3220092013
Hayward, Lazar 3220082013
Hayward, Lazar 3220072013
Diener, Travis20052010
Diener, Travis20042010
Diener, Travis20032010
Estimated 2.5 future NBA/season

Over those seasons MU had 33 players on the roster who made the NBA - understanding that a four-year player like Lazar Hayward counts as four. The current players add a total of 2.2 anticipated spots based on adding the percentages from last year.

While some teams have many more one-and-dones, the fact that MU has had so many players stay through their senior year and then make it to the NBA has led to a roster that averages 2.5 future NBA players each season.

The Blue Bloods are higher - led by an incredible average of 5.1 per Duke roster - but the vast majority of schools do not see the number of future NBA players on the court as we see at the Bradley Center.

RnkSchool since 2003Future NBA/YearTotal
1Duke5.171.9
2Kansas4.968.1
3North Carolina4.766.4
4Kentucky4.766.3
5UCLA3.549.0
6Connecticut3.143.6
7Washington3.041.9
8Syracuse3.041.6
9Arizona3.041.4
10Michigan St.2.940.7
11Louisville2.838.5
12Memphis2.737.4
13Notre Dame2.535.5
14Florida2.535.5
15Marquette2.535.2
16Georgetown2.534.9
17Texas2.534.5
18Michigan2.433.4
19Gonzaga2.129.3
20Wisconsin2.027.4
21Georgia Tech1.926.8
22LSU1.825.4
23Oklahoma St.1.825.3
24Villanova1.824.7
25Florida St.1.824.6
26Maryland1.723.9
27Vanderbilt1.622.7
28Iowa St.1.622.0
29Colorado1.621.8
30Illinois1.521.5
31California1.521.0
32Virginia1.521.0
33Purdue1.420.3
34USC1.419.9
35Georgia1.419.6
36Tennessee1.419.3
37Indiana1.419.2
38North Carolina St.1.419.0
39Pittsburgh1.419.0
40Texas A and M1.318.1
41Arkansas1.317.9
42Missouri1.317.7
43Nevada1.217.0
44New Mexico1.217.0
45Miami FL1.216.9
46Stanford1.216.4
47Oregon1.116.0
48Alabama1.115.7
49Wake Forest1.115.4
50Ohio St.1.115.3


Source: Fischer, JJJ or Cheatham Could Join Ellenson in NBA to keep MU in Top 15 NBA Factories

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22870
Sometimes -- oftentimes -- the "eye test" is far superior to any stats.

IMHO ...

Luke has about 10% chance of being an NBA player. Too slow and mechanical, not nearly strong enough, no face-up game. He plays "smaller" than he is against many college post players not nearly as tall as he is; every NBA roster has 3-4 players like that. I am really glad Luke is a Warrior and, unlike some, I do think he has improved. But it's a major leap from decent college big to NBA big, and his game does not fit what most NBA teams want in their bigs today.

JJJ has about 20% chance. I actually would have said less, but I was so wrong about Buycks that I'll allow that maybe I'm not fully assessing JJJ's potential.

Haanif has the best chance of the three because he is a freshman with talent who already logs significant minutes and has 3 more years to develop his game and his body. Too early to put a percentage on it, though.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12864
  • 9-9-9
Sometimes -- oftentimes -- the "eye test" is far superior to any stats.

IMHO ...

Luke has about 10% chance of being an NBA player. Too slow and mechanical, not nearly strong enough, no face-up game. He plays "smaller" than he is against many college post players not nearly as tall as he is; every NBA roster has 3-4 players like that. I am really glad Luke is a Warrior and, unlike some, I do think he has improved. But it's a major leap from decent college big to NBA big, and his game does not fit what most NBA teams want in their bigs today.

JJJ has about 20% chance. I actually would have said less, but I was so wrong about Buycks that I'll allow that maybe I'm not fully assessing JJJ's potential.

Haanif has the best chance of the three because he is a freshman with talent who already logs significant minutes and has 3 more years to develop his game and his body. Too early to put a percentage on it, though.
I am happy we have Luke and agree with most of your points on him . The only thing I would add is Size can't be taught and he has it , and that gives him a chance at making the next level albeit small.

JJJ had a high ceiling . We are just seeing him scratch the surface . He has length, court vision , quickness ,is a very good passer and is excellent in transition . He has a left and should start using it more.  If he continues to make progress at the rate he did this year he could be a classic late bloomer. He has embraced the coaches philosophy and is going to be a beneficiary of their experience.

Haanif has the tools as You pointed out. He has to keep progressing at a steady rate in strength and experience.

Winning is overrated. The only time it is really important is in surgery and war.
                       ---Al McGuire

MerrittsMustache

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4676
I am happy we have Luke and agree with most of your points on him . The only thing I would add is Size can't be taught and he has it , and that gives him a chance at making the next level albeit small.

JJJ had a high ceiling . We are just seeing him scratch the surface . He has length, court vision , quickness ,is a very good passer and is excellent in transition . He has a left and should start using it more.  If he continues to make progress at the rate he did this year he could be a classic late bloomer. He has embraced the coaches philosophy and is going to be a beneficiary of their experience.

Haanif has the tools as You pointed out. He has to keep progressing at a steady rate in strength and experience.

Haanif has an excellent chance to be an NBA player as a legit 6'5" PG with some outside shooting ability. He obviously needs to work on his court vision and decision-making while adding some bulk, but he's got the height and potential. Give it time and he's going to be a star (in college, at least).

Much like with Blue and Jamil, for either Luke or JJJ to be an NBA player, they need to develop a niche. These guys all max out as NBA "rotation players" (i.e. the 8-10th man) but are much more likely to find themselves as end-of-the-bench guys if they reach that level.  For the most part, that type of player can catch onto an NBA roster because they have one aspect of their game that is NBA-caliber - shooting, scoring, rebounding, ball-handling, being big, etc. Right now, I simply don't see it.

TSmith34, Inc.

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5144
Luke... has no face-up game.

As far as I've seen, he is 2 for 2 in his Marquette career on 12'-15' jumpers.
If you think for one second that I am comparing the USA to China you have bumped your hard.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22870
As far as I've seen, he is 2 for 2 in his Marquette career on 12'-15' jumpers.

Nope. He missed one early this season from the same spot he hit that one the other night.

But still, he's shooting 66.6% on them.

Soon enough, he'll be hoistin' up 3s!
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

ChitownSpaceForRent

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6315
As far as I've seen, he is 2 for 2 in his Marquette career on 12'-15' jumpers.

Did you include the fall away against ASU last year?

We R Final Four

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6592
Sometimes -- oftentimes -- the "eye test" is far superior to any stats.

IMHO ...

Luke has about 10% chance of being an NBA player.
About a month ago 82 you said "no way/no how" regarding Luke's NBA chances.  I see you are coming around now with the 10% chance!

I believe Luke will continue to improve--as he has already--and get a shot at an NBA team.
~7' who is athletic and has moves with either hand from either block will garner more attention but end of next year.

MerrittsMustache

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4676
About a month ago 82 you said "no way/no how" regarding Luke's NBA chances.  I see you are coming around now with the 10% chance!

I believe Luke will continue to improve--as he has already--and get a shot at an NBA team.
~7' who is athletic and has moves with either hand from either block will garner more attention but end of next year.

True, back-to-the-basket big men are becoming extinct in the current NBA.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22870
About a month ago 82 you said "no way/no how" regarding Luke's NBA chances.  I see you are coming around now with the 10% chance!

I believe Luke will continue to improve--as he has already--and get a shot at an NBA team.
~7' who is athletic and has moves with either hand from either block will garner more attention but end of next year.

Honestly, I typed 0.1% but then I realized that was being too certain about an unknown so I changed it to 10%. But I really do think it's closer to the former than the latter.

Unless a big man has extraordinary rebounding skills or post moves or athletic ability or all three, a big as limited as Luke has little chance.

I applaud you on your memory of my past posts, however.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

wadesworld

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 17526
Luke has a much better chance of going to the NBA than JJJ.
Rocket Trigger Warning (wild that saying this would trigger anyone, but it's the world we live in): Black Lives Matter

brandx

  • Guest
Luke has a much better chance of going to the NBA than JJJ.

I don't know what NBA skill that JJJ has. He has averaged less than 7 pts and about 2.2 rebounds a game on a very offensively challenged team. Not to mention a lack of strength and elite defensive ability.

HC has a chance if he can make adjustments to his game. the physical skills/quickness are there. I think he could be a very good defensive player in time. Be offensively, at least right now, he only does two things - drive to the hoop and hit the open three. No continuity within the offense and absolutely no mid-range game. With his quickness, if he knew how to pull up for the 12'-14' after getting by the first defender, he would be deadly and could be a 16-20 point scorer in college.

I think Luke has a chance, but only as a big body 11th or 12th man on a roster.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22870
Luke has a much better chance of going to the NBA than JJJ.

I guess we'll find out 16-20 months from now if either of them has a chance in hell. My educated guess is no.

At least the few who think Luke does have a chance aren't claiming he'd school Dirk, so we're making progress here.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26440
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
I think Luke could get a shot in the NBA simply because of his frame and because he does have a few high level skills. He's a good shot-blocker and his hook is reliable and hard to defend. I'm not at all saying he's a front-line NBA player, but based on having a few talents and the right body I think someone will give him a chance.

Could he stick? I'm not sure about that. Just doesn't seem to have the strength or athleticism. I definitely think he'll flirt with the league and could get a cup of coffee, but I don't see him as a long-term NBA guy.

JJ...well, I get the Buycks argument (though I was one of the few that said he had a shot at the NBA while he was still here) but the reason DB got a shot is because he transformed himself into a PG. I couldn't see JJ going that route, and feel he's probably just a hair or two off of being what the league wants in a 2/3. Not quite big enough, not quite strong enough, not quite a good enough shooter.

I'd say of the players mentioned, Haney has the best chance. He's got a good looking jumper and a legitimate go-to move. He is also a very good defender. He'd need to develop his right and improve his all-around game, but if you can shoot, drive, and defend, that's a good start.

Outside chance, I'd say that Duane could get there too. He'd need to prove he can go the Buycks route and become a PG though. Can't see him making it at any other position.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.