collapse

* Recent Posts

2024 Transfer Portal by PGsHeroes32
[Today at 10:14:22 AM]


2024 Coaching Carousel by Uncle Rico
[Today at 09:52:19 AM]


Katz has MU in Final Four by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 09:51:44 AM]


10 years after “Done Deal” … It’s Happening! by Zog from Margo
[Today at 09:41:55 AM]


Big East 23-24 NCAA and NIT Results by cheebs09
[Today at 09:36:47 AM]


Pep Band/Cheerleaders by TallTitan34
[Today at 09:22:48 AM]


Chicago bars for Fri game by Bob "Big Daddy" Wild
[Today at 08:40:12 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte  (Read 11895 times)

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks

forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4726
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2015, 01:12:27 PM »
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dorothypomerantz/2015/03/25/are-you-willing-to-pay-36-per-month-for-espn/


I would rather that be the case and people that don't want ESPN not be forced to pay $6-8 a month.  I am a sports fan, but would rather save the $6-8 and miss out on ESPN content.  The price just isn't worth it.

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 15994
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2015, 01:12:44 PM »
How much for the cookin' and travel channels?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Chicago_inferiority_complexes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2015, 01:26:20 PM »
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dorothypomerantz/2015/03/25/are-you-willing-to-pay-36-per-month-for-espn/




Is this the exact same guy that was quoted in 4-5 news stories which you posted a few months ago, as individual, separate reports?

rocky_warrior

  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9002
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2015, 02:50:16 PM »
Didn't Sling TV already set the price at $20/mo?

Pakuni

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9875
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2015, 02:52:47 PM »
Didn't Sling TV already set the price at $20/mo?

Yep, including many other channels (CNN, TNT, TBS, History and Disney among them).

Groin_pull

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1861
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2015, 03:17:02 PM »
$36 per month for ESPN? Hahaha. No thanks. I barely watch that network now. I've curtailed my sports viewing a lot of the past few years. Doubt I'd miss the "WWL" too much.

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2015, 03:25:02 PM »
Didn't Sling TV already set the price at $20/mo?

Not by itself.  You pay for the bundle.  It keeps prices down.  I'm talking A LA CARTE, which so many people say they want.....until they don't want it when the economics are built into it.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2015, 07:34:44 PM by ChicosBailBonds »

brandx

  • Guest
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2015, 04:24:06 PM »
So where has ESPN announced the $36 price?

I have yet to see it.

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2015, 04:31:10 PM »
Not buy itself.  You pay for the bundle.  It keeps prices down.  I'm talking A LA CARTE, which so many people say they want.....until they don't want it when the economics are built into it.

Well, this is just basic economics then, isn't it?

ESPN has to charge $36 to make a profit, people don't subscribe and watch, so ESPN can't pay as much for it's content.

Am I missing something?

mu_hilltopper

  • Warrior
  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7403
    • https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2015, 05:08:11 PM »
I gotta figure ESPN is pricing it so high that zero people would purchase to make a point.

brandx

  • Guest
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2015, 06:08:12 PM »
I gotta figure ESPN is pricing it so high that zero people would purchase to make a point.

I haven't seen anywhere that ESPN pricing will be that high.

Using some complex mathematical formulas, analyst Michael Nathanson arrived at some interesting per-subscriber price projections for major cable networks operating in a world where channels get paid based more purely on the amount of people who actually watch them.

In other words, it will not cost $36 a month. Instead, it is more of the crap that Chicos throws at the wall.

rocky_warrior

  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9002
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2015, 07:13:35 PM »
Not buy itself.  You pay for the bundle.  It keeps prices down.  I'm talking A LA CARTE, which so many people say they want.....until they don't want it when the economics are built into it.

So you agree. ESPN would never launch a la carte at that price.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2015, 07:35:49 PM by rocky_warrior »

77ncaachamps

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8457
  • Last of the Warrior Class
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2015, 09:48:31 PM »
That would kill the ESPN contracts for the big conferences!!!
SS Marquette

Chicago_inferiority_complexes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #14 on: March 26, 2015, 09:49:59 PM »
So you agree. ESPN would never launch a la carte at that price.

Don't be silly. Supply and demand works for everything in the universe except cable bills.

chapman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5746
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #15 on: March 27, 2015, 07:15:46 AM »
Quote
Don't be silly. Supply and demand works for everything in the universe except cable bills.

We all demand to pay $12 a month for equipment leases, only to be told upon cancellation that you can toss it all because they don't want it back.

Chicago_inferiority_complexes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #16 on: March 27, 2015, 07:32:12 AM »
We all demand to pay $12 a month for equipment leases, only to be told upon cancellation that you can toss it all because they don't want it back.

Not sure how that relates to my joke, but sounds like another reason to ditch cable...

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #17 on: March 27, 2015, 11:35:21 AM »
Well, this is just basic economics then, isn't it?

ESPN has to charge $36 to make a profit, people don't subscribe and watch, so ESPN can't pay as much for it's content.

Am I missing something?


Just providing helpful information on what a la carte is going to cost since it continues to be the "rage" of some folks.

Canned Goods n Ammo

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
  • Ammo, clean shaven Ammo.
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #18 on: March 27, 2015, 12:19:44 PM »
Just providing helpful information on what a la carte is going to cost since it continues to be the "rage" of some folks.

I still want ala carte. Even if ESPN costs $100 per month.

I don't think consumers need to subsidize a bunch of stuff they don't use/watch. My mom doesn't watch ESPN, so she wouldn't subscribe.

If they went full ala cart, ESPN would likely have to adjust their business model because they can't keep paying billions of dollars for television rights and just pass the costs onto the cable providers, who in turn just spread the costs out incrementally amongst a lot of people who don't even use that product.

It's UnAmerican. It's like entertainment Communism. I won't stand for it, sir.


forgetful

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4726
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #19 on: March 27, 2015, 01:21:26 PM »
I still want ala carte. Even if ESPN costs $100 per month.

I don't think consumers need to subsidize a bunch of stuff they don't use/watch. My mom doesn't watch ESPN, so she wouldn't subscribe.

If they went full ala cart, ESPN would likely have to adjust their business model because they can't keep paying billions of dollars for television rights and just pass the costs onto the cable providers, who in turn just spread the costs out incrementally amongst a lot of people who don't even use that product.

It's UnAmerican. It's like entertainment Communism. I won't stand for it, sir.



Well said, this is my view also.

brandx

  • Guest
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #20 on: March 27, 2015, 02:48:22 PM »
I still want ala carte. Even if ESPN costs $100 per month.

I don't think consumers need to subsidize a bunch of stuff they don't use/watch. My mom doesn't watch ESPN, so she wouldn't subscribe.

If they went full ala cart, ESPN would likely have to adjust their business model because they can't keep paying billions of dollars for television rights and just pass the costs onto the cable providers, who in turn just spread the costs out incrementally amongst a lot of people who don't even use that product.

It's UnAmerican. It's like entertainment Communism. I won't stand for it, sir.



As far as your premise, I agree 100%

But, we have no idea what ESPN will charge for a la carte service. It certainly won't be $36.

Well, unless every cable and Sat company goes out of business. The $36 pricing was based on a hypothetical that cable companies didn't exist. It is based on no reality that I know of.

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #21 on: April 05, 2015, 07:32:45 PM »
Didn't Sling TV already set the price at $20/mo?

Ouch


http://www.theverge.com/2015/4/5/8348885/sling-tv-ncaa-finals-problems-watching


That's with only 100K customers, too. 

Chicago_inferiority_complexes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 844
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #22 on: April 05, 2015, 08:05:58 PM »
Ouch


http://www.theverge.com/2015/4/5/8348885/sling-tv-ncaa-finals-problems-watching


That's with only 100K customers, too. 

Is the NC on CBS? Amazed that last weekend and Saturday were on TBS.

A couple bars around here should send their thanks to CBS for not screening it on broadcast.

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12220
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #23 on: April 05, 2015, 09:15:29 PM »
I still want ala carte. Even if ESPN costs $100 per month.

I don't think consumers need to subsidize a bunch of stuff they don't use/watch. My mom doesn't watch ESPN, so she wouldn't subscribe.

If they went full ala cart, ESPN would likely have to adjust their business model because they can't keep paying billions of dollars for television rights and just pass the costs onto the cable providers, who in turn just spread the costs out incrementally amongst a lot of people who don't even use that product.

It's UnAmerican. It's like entertainment Communism. I won't stand for it, sir.



You, sir, are a principled capitalist and I salute you. The "Chico Way" - free enterprise for the poor, crony capitalism or corporate welfare/socialism for the rich and powerful is morally bankrupt to anyone with a brain and a heart.

mu_hilltopper

  • Warrior
  • Global Moderator
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7403
    • https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys
Re: $36 a month for ESPN only a la carte
« Reply #24 on: April 06, 2015, 07:49:04 AM »
Amazed that last weekend and Saturday were on TBS.


Indeed .. what was that all about?  FF games on TBS? 

I guess they wanted fewer people watching.

 

feedback