collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally

2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1
'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024-25 Non-Conference Schedule by THRILLHO
[Today at 12:15:01 AM]
2024 Transfer Portal by mug644
[April 23, 2024, 11:48:37 PM]
2024-25 Outlook by Lennys Tap
[April 23, 2024, 09:42:02 PM]
Big East 2024 Offseason by Herman Cain
[April 23, 2024, 09:23:41 PM]
Best case scenarios by Frenns Liquor Depot
[April 23, 2024, 03:55:21 PM]
Marquette Football Update by Viper
[April 23, 2024, 11:02:10 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

 Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All

Author Topic: #86 in Kenpom's Preseason Rankings  (Read 6411 times)

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10455
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: #86 in Kenpom's Preseason Rankings
« Reply #25 on: October 27, 2014, 11:19:15 PM »
Quote from: The Adventures of HE-Man and the Kangaroo Kid on October 27, 2014, 10:27:14 PM
The model predicts 9th in KP ranking. Not necessarily 9th in the conference. I guess he projects a rough non-conference? Maybe due to Luke's absence?

I'm trying to picture how an 8-10 team could get 9th out of 10.

1. Nova (14-4)
2. Georgetown (13-5)
3. St. John's (11-7)
4. Creighton (9-9)
5. Providence (9-9)
6. Xavier (9-9)
7. Butler (8-10)
8. Seton Hall (8-10)
9. Marquette (8-10)
10. Depaul (1-17)

That would suck for our conference. Would need stellar non-conferences to get more than 2 bids!

Yeah, that is an important distinction.
Logged
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

g0lden3agle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1046
Re: #86 in Kenpom's Preseason Rankings
« Reply #26 on: October 28, 2014, 06:43:30 AM »
edit: nevermind
« Last Edit: October 28, 2014, 06:46:01 AM by g0lden3agle »
Logged

The Lens

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4933
Re: #86 in Kenpom's Preseason Rankings
« Reply #27 on: October 28, 2014, 12:15:34 PM »
Two teams in the Top 35 and people wonder why Dana O'Neil wrote what she wrote. 
Logged
The Teal Train has left the station and Lens is day drinking in the bar car.    ---- Dr. Blackheart

History is so valuable if you have the humility to learn from it.    ---- Shaka Smart

bilsu

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8822
Re: #86 in Kenpom's Preseason Rankings
« Reply #28 on: October 28, 2014, 12:25:56 PM »
Quote from: 4everwarriors on October 27, 2014, 01:39:25 PM
Lock for the NIT, assumin' a soft bubble, hey?
The NIT automatically takes conference champions, who lose in their conference tournament like UWGB did last year. NCAA 68 + NIT 32=100 bids of which there will be at least 20 teams rated worse then 86th that are taking up bids. 100-20=80, which leaves 86th 6 teams short of an NIT bid. This of course is not exact, but the 86th ranked team is not likely to get an at large bid to either tournament.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All
« previous next »
 
feedback