collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024 Transfer Portal by wadesworld
[Today at 05:56:07 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by tower912
[Today at 05:47:31 PM]


Does Bucky NOT have a Basketball NIL? by WhiteTrash
[Today at 03:52:54 PM]


Marquette Football Update by TallTitan34
[Today at 09:41:46 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Guarding Kaminsky  (Read 35545 times)

brandx

  • Guest
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #50 on: October 15, 2014, 08:43:42 PM »
Juan.

Absolutely. JJJ has no chance at all - giving up around 5 inches and who knows how many pounds.

Benny B

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5969
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #51 on: October 15, 2014, 08:44:57 PM »
Start a walk-on.  Have him "lose" the ball at Kaminski's knees, and when he bends over to pick it up.... BAM!  Elbow to the temple.
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

Texas Western

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #52 on: October 15, 2014, 08:47:12 PM »
Your counter line up ensures our ass getting kicked. No offense.
So then what do you propose as the counter line up?

JD

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1291
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #53 on: October 15, 2014, 09:40:08 PM »
Call me an optimist or an idiot, but I think MU keeps it within 4 points.  Anyone care to wager?
“I think everyone should go to college and get a degree and then spend six months as a bartender and six months as a cabdriver. Then they would really be educated.”

AL

bilsu

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8822
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #54 on: October 15, 2014, 09:50:52 PM »
Call me an optimist or an idiot, but I think MU keeps it within 4 points.  Anyone care to wager?
What do you want to wager? I give you two beers to one.

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22915
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #55 on: October 15, 2014, 10:07:33 PM »
Call me an optimist or an idiot, but I think MU keeps it within 4 points.  Anyone care to wager?

I'd accept the wager -- and even give you 8 points -- but I NEVER put myself in a position to root against Marquette. When I've been in Vegas, even when we sucked under Dukiet, I wouldn't bet against us.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

We R Final Four

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6598
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #56 on: October 15, 2014, 10:41:04 PM »
Sounds like Chicos trying to diminish Bert's accomplishments.  The problem is, Wisconsin did play a home game against Oregon last March.  Those are the lamest arguments out there.  "If this team didn't do this then..."  Or, "If you take away these 3 (good or bad, depending on the argument) performances from this player, then his numbers aren't that (good/bad)!"  Bucky did play Oregon at "home," and then won 2 games after that on a neutral court, and went to a Final Four.  And this year they return everyone but one of their many 3 point shooters.  They're a dang good team and we frankly just won't be that good.

Thank you--a voice of reason.

WarriorFan

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1642
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #57 on: October 16, 2014, 02:24:20 AM »
I think this will be the first real test of Wojo from a game strategy perspective.  I believe there are ways to beat Bo's system, and that one must beat the system, not any specific player or players, when playing against his teams.

In years past, the way to beat Bo was to run.  Last year's UW team could run with anyone, but you could tell Bo only let it happen reluctantly. 

What would I do?  I'd put JJJ on Kaminsky (backed up by Juan) and would run a full court press with a half court trap and force as many turnovers as possible by going for every steal and getting in the passing lanes.  I'd try to turn the whole game into Chaos so they get their (deadly) offense set up on less than half of possessions. 

I'm sure Wojo will come up with something even better.
"The meaning of life isn't gnashing our bicuspids over what comes after death but tasting the tiny moments that come before it."

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9583
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #58 on: October 16, 2014, 05:25:07 AM »
So then what do you propose as the counter line up?
Guys who can score. We already know that Juan and Derrick can't, and to a lesser extent Steve. That line-up would be offensively challenged. If you get 16-20 points from those 3, you would be lucky.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

tower912

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 23741
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #59 on: October 16, 2014, 05:38:06 AM »
I think this will be the first real test of Wojo from a game strategy perspective.  I believe there are ways to beat Bo's system, and that one must beat the system, not any specific player or players, when playing against his teams.

In years past, the way to beat Bo was to run.  Last year's UW team could run with anyone, but you could tell Bo only let it happen reluctantly. 

What would I do?  I'd put JJJ on Kaminsky (backed up by Juan) and would run a full court press with a half court trap and force as many turnovers as possible by going for every steal and getting in the passing lanes.  I'd try to turn the whole game into Chaos so they get their (deadly) offense set up on less than half of possessions. 

I'm sure Wojo will come up with something even better.
I agree in principle with what you are saying.  If you are more athletic, f with them.   I don't think it works this year because (A) MU has only 9 scholarship players, (B) Wiscy IS athletic, (C) their athleticism is disciplined, (D) I am not assuming Wojo has superpowers. 
Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

swoopem

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1276
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #60 on: October 16, 2014, 08:13:06 AM »
When looking at the schedule I'm marking this game a loss. That said I don't think it'll be a blowout or an embarrassment as some of you have mentioned. Everyone worries that Steve will get in foul trouble, what happens if Kaminsky gets in foul trouble? I assume we'll be attacking the rim and that can lead to some fouls on that goon. If he has to sit for a period of time that would be huge. Also, you guys are saying if Dekker goes off we're done. Well if we're hitting our 3s then I like our chances a lot. This is a two way street and I don't see a reason to automatically assume the worst. Either way I see it being a close game and having home court could be a key factor. We'll also be battle tested after playing in the Orlando classic. It's not like this will be our first game, ala Ohio St last year (Grambling St. doesn't count).
Bring back FFP!!!

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #61 on: October 16, 2014, 08:22:51 AM »
When looking at the schedule I'm marking this game a loss. That said I don't think it'll be a blowout or an embarrassment as some of you have mentioned. Everyone worries that Steve will get in foul trouble, what happens if Kaminsky gets in foul trouble? I assume we'll be attacking the rim and that can lead to some fouls on that goon. If he has to sit for a period of time that would be huge. Also, you guys are saying if Dekker goes off we're done. Well if we're hitting our 3s then I like our chances a lot. This is a two way street and I don't see a reason to automatically assume the worst. Either way I see it being a close game and having home court could be a key factor. We'll also be battle tested after playing in the Orlando classic. It's not like this will be our first game, ala Ohio St last year (Grambling St. doesn't count).


Well yeah.  I mean really that might be our only real hope here.

But it's not as though this group of players have shown they can consistently do this yet.

4everwarriors

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #62 on: October 16, 2014, 08:25:45 AM »
Probably gotta play like our hair's on fire, hey?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22159
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #63 on: October 16, 2014, 08:28:01 AM »
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/11710007/wisconsin-unanimously-picked-win-big-ten

I think this is the first time Bo Ryan has ever managed this.

And to no one's surprise, the Badger Troll Myron Medcalf is all over this one.
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22915
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #64 on: October 16, 2014, 08:41:01 AM »
When looking at the schedule I'm marking this game a loss. That said I don't think it'll be a blowout or an embarrassment as some of you have mentioned. Everyone worries that Steve will get in foul trouble, what happens if Kaminsky gets in foul trouble? I assume we'll be attacking the rim and that can lead to some fouls on that goon. If he has to sit for a period of time that would be huge. Also, you guys are saying if Dekker goes off we're done. Well if we're hitting our 3s then I like our chances a lot. This is a two way street and I don't see a reason to automatically assume the worst. Either way I see it being a close game and having home court could be a key factor. We'll also be battle tested after playing in the Orlando classic. It's not like this will be our first game, ala Ohio St last year (Grambling St. doesn't count).

Wisconsin just has to play its game -- or something resembling it -- to beat us handily. We need a whole lot of "ifs" to even have a chance.

But I do like your optimism, even if I am having trouble finding that inside myself for this game.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

dgies9156

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4044
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #65 on: October 16, 2014, 08:55:23 AM »
All right, here's the secret to beating Wisconsin. Teams that figure this out ocassionally beat the Red Rodent. Teams that don't lose.

The Rodent's coach is very good. He takes talented, smart players and disciplines them. You don't often see the rodent playing out of control. Just like you didn't see our teams often playing out of control when St. Al was head coach. Instead, the Red Rodent frustrates his opponent until they go mad and often lose it.

If you want to beat the rodent, you make him play your game. You get him out of sync, usually with speed, turnovers and threes. You make him run until he is falling over and you substitute freely because you have to. In other words, you throw the kitchen sink at the rodent. We win when we make the rodent play Marquette ball and get the rodent behind.

Can we do this in December? I don't know. But I am not writing us off just yet.

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10455
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #66 on: October 16, 2014, 09:04:56 AM »
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/11710007/wisconsin-unanimously-picked-win-big-ten

I think this is the first time Bo Ryan has ever managed this.

And to no one's surprise, the Badger Troll Myron Medcalf is all over this one.

As we learned last year, there is no better time to worry than when your picked to take first place.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Benny B

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5969
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #67 on: October 16, 2014, 09:07:36 AM »
Give Bo a taste of his own medicine.  He wants to slow the game down, let's slow it down.  Make a substitution at every whistle.  Ask for clarification from the officials on every close call.  Ask for a "2 or 3" replay after every 3pt shot.  Turn it into a 3-1/2 hour game.

Just like filling a balloon with too much air... eventually, Bo is going to pop.
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

JakeBarnes

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5582
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #68 on: October 16, 2014, 09:15:03 AM »
Probably gotta play like our hair's on fire, hey?

Shoulda brought Malek in...
Assume what I say should be in teal if it doesn't pass the smell test for you.


Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10455
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #69 on: October 16, 2014, 09:29:01 AM »
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

MUfan12

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5641
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #70 on: October 16, 2014, 09:48:02 AM »
This could be a game where Duane really shines. UW had a hellish time keeping quicker PGs out of the lane last season. All it usually took was a high ball screen. Yogi went nuts on them in Bloomington, and they didn't run much other than that in the second half.

mu-rara

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #71 on: October 16, 2014, 09:51:53 AM »
Consensus this year has to be Rodents.  We know what Bo has.  We have no idea what Wojo has, particularly this early in his first year.

Rodent / Marquette game often goes opposite of consensus.

Go Warriors.

BCHoopster

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3215
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #72 on: October 16, 2014, 10:10:44 AM »
All right, here's the secret to beating Wisconsin. Teams that figure this out ocassionally beat the Red Rodent. Teams that don't lose.

The Rodent's coach is very good. He takes talented, smart players and disciplines them. You don't often see the rodent playing out of control. Just like you didn't see our teams often playing out of control when St. Al was head coach. Instead, the Red Rodent frustrates his opponent until they go mad and often lose it.

If you want to beat the rodent, you make him play your game. You get him out of sync, usually with speed, turnovers and threes. You make him run until he is falling over and you substitute freely because you have to. In other words, you throw the kitchen sink at the rodent. We win when we make the rodent play Marquette ball and get the rodent behind.

Can we do this in December? I don't know. But I am not writing us off just yet.


First, good points, but the only way to win is to turn them over early, as they will control the boards, and like you said make it a track meet.  The problem is that UW gets great coaching on
the defensive end and it is hard to beat them in a half court game.  I really believe if Wisconsin is going to win the NCAA it is this year, and Bo's last chance, talent and experience are there.
I do not care who he brings in the following year but he has 5 seasoned players who are in their last year, plus 2 really good sophs, I think Al usually went 7 deep, this is there chance.   Mu will compete better the following year with Ellenson and experience.

JWags85

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2994
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #73 on: October 16, 2014, 10:19:39 AM »
Not sure how Badger fans, and the Badger board specifically, are going to be able to function this year without screaming every week about how disrespected they are in the media.

Also, I know potential is everything in the NBA, but I still can't figure how Dekker is still projected as a lottery pick.  He's now a Junior, so he's past the "raw, untapped talent" level where people like Noah Vonleh or Alex Lens would fall in, but yet I can't recall him dominating or taking over games like you would expect an older lottery pick to.  Not saying he's a bad player, of course we'd love to have him, but I'm not sold on him being one of those lottery pick studs.  Hell, I still think he's a good distance away from Gordon Hayward when he declared.

Silkk the Shaka

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5377
Re: Guarding Kaminsky
« Reply #74 on: October 16, 2014, 10:25:57 AM »
This could be a game where Duane really shines. UW had a hellish time keeping quicker PGs out of the lane last season. All it usually took was a high ball screen. Yogi went nuts on them in Bloomington, and they didn't run much other than that in the second half.

Ooooooohhh like the sound of that. Pretty sure Henry said that Wojo sold him on high ball screen pro-style offense. Could work wonders against UW with this guard-heavy roster this year. Holding out hope!