collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

* Recent Posts

2024 NCAA Tournament Thread by lawdog77
[Today at 07:14:12 PM]


MU Gear by MUfan12
[Today at 07:05:50 PM]


Maximilian Langenfeld by Tyler COLEk
[Today at 07:03:51 PM]


2024 Transfer Portal by jfp61
[Today at 06:19:23 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by Uncle Rico
[Today at 05:33:25 PM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by WhiteTrash
[Today at 04:47:36 PM]


NIL Future by Uncle Rico
[Today at 03:56:29 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?  (Read 14965 times)

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #50 on: July 10, 2014, 06:59:52 PM »
It could have been during the time you were persona non grata on this board.

That's my current state as well.   ;)

MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22870
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #51 on: July 10, 2014, 07:03:50 PM »
That's my current state as well.   ;)

Oh, Chicos, you'll always be persona grata to me!
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #52 on: July 10, 2014, 09:04:50 PM »
Hurricanes, doesn't count.

Centenary Gentlemen
Bucknell Bison
UWGB Phoenix
Elon Phoenix
Nevada Wolfpack
NC State Wolf Pack
Hofstra Pride (formerly Hofstra Flying Dutchmen which also qualified)
Illinois Fighting Illini
Notre Dame Fighting Irish
UMASS Minutemen
Marshall Thundering Herd
Union Dutchmen
Navy Midshipmen
William and Mary Tribe
Northern Kentucky Norse


Centenerary are no longer D1, no fair!
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


keefe

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8331
  • "Death From Above"
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #53 on: July 10, 2014, 09:20:12 PM »
Centenerary are no longer D1, no fair!

Does The Chief know about this?

Actually, can we still call him The Chief?


Death on call

WellsstreetWanderer

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2108
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #54 on: July 10, 2014, 09:32:55 PM »
I certainly hope so.                   Otherwise what do we do with   _ _ _ _ Council, Fire _ _ _ _ ,   _ _ _ _  Justice,
  _ _ _ _ of Police etc.?

keefe

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8331
  • "Death From Above"
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #55 on: July 10, 2014, 09:39:48 PM »
Crimson Tide
SJU Storm


Death on call

keefe

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8331
  • "Death From Above"
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #56 on: July 10, 2014, 10:04:24 PM »
I think the bottom line is that MU really misunderstood the power of branding. I have no idea about The Zizzo Group but MU lost a tremendous opportunity when it listened to those chuckleheads.

I have a few colleagues who went to RISD and they love the Scrotie Mascot. RISD is a superb school with an international reputation for excellence. They have fun with their mascot which has reinforced the school's position as a center for innovation, creativity, and avante garde thought. Marquette would do well to take notice. Gold was brutally mishandled and Golden Eagle is more than lame.






Death on call

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #57 on: July 10, 2014, 10:53:14 PM »
Crimson Tide
SJU Storm

Crimson is a color

Red storm....red is a color

Neither count

River rat

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #58 on: July 10, 2014, 11:44:35 PM »
This nickname would have been #2 behind Warriors with every other one miles behind. It had history (our football team was so nicknamed back in the day) and a unique/cool factor. Plus it would have forever enshrined the Avalanche Bar in spite of the administration tearing the joint down.




I spoke to cords during the whole lightning versus eagles debate and qwestioned him why they were choosing between two stupid nicknames and not just go with golden avalanche.  He stated that avalanche was rejected because they couldnt come up with a mascot.  So i asked him , well what a bout lightning which really has the same problem?  He couldnt answer me.  Didnt create much confidence in our leadership for me.

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10463
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #59 on: July 10, 2014, 11:54:19 PM »
I spoke to cords during the whole lightning versus eagles debate and qwestioned him why they were choosing between two stupid nicknames and not just go with golden avalanche.  He stated that avalanche was rejected because they couldnt come up with a mascot.  So i asked him , well what a bout lightning which really has the same problem?  He couldnt answer me.  Didnt create much confidence in our leadership for me.

So because you pointed that out were the golden eagles... Jeeze thanks a lot!
Maigh Eo for Sam

keefe

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8331
  • "Death From Above"
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #60 on: July 11, 2014, 12:01:39 AM »
Crimson is a color

Red storm....red is a color

Neither count

But Roll Tide ain't!


Death on call

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #61 on: July 11, 2014, 12:05:08 AM »
But Roll Tide ain't!

Correct, but that's not their official name.  Just like Ramblin Wreck of Georgia Tech doesn't count, or War Eagle for Auburn.  Has to be the official team name.

77ncaachamps

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8457
  • Last of the Warrior Class
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #62 on: July 11, 2014, 12:15:12 AM »
north dakota state bison
North Texas Mean Green?
Presbyterian Blue Hose
Nevada WOlf Pack
St. Francis Red FLash
Howard Bison
« Last Edit: July 11, 2014, 12:21:28 AM by 77ncaachamps »
SS Marquette

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #63 on: July 11, 2014, 12:58:47 AM »
north dakota state bison
North Texas Mean Green?
Presbyterian Blue Hose
Nevada WOlf Pack
St. Francis Red FLash
Howard Bison


Can't have a color in the name. Good call on the bison. I think everyone missed those
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10463
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #64 on: July 11, 2014, 01:37:39 AM »
Anybody say the Fighting Sioux?
Maigh Eo for Sam

MU Fan in Connecticut

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3461
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #65 on: July 11, 2014, 07:18:17 AM »
It's the Kent State Golden Flashes, so it doesn't count. Marshall is one of the schools but it's Thundering Herd. And suprisingly there is no D1 lightning as far as I know.

I recall during the dumping of the Warriors name, that Lightning was brought up that it would be unique to Marquette.  Chainsaw Al different ideas.

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #66 on: July 11, 2014, 09:00:07 AM »
Anybody say the Fighting Sioux?

No longer the name...the Tolerance Lobby killed it.


MU82

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22870
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #67 on: July 11, 2014, 09:41:37 AM »
No longer the name...the Tolerance Lobby killed it.



And yet, somehow, the university didn't have to close its doors or shut down all of its sports programs.

Just as Marquette continued to exist and its athletic department became richer than ever.

Look, I wish we still were the Warriors, but the drama is so overdone.
“It’s not how white men fight.” - Tucker Carlson

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #68 on: July 11, 2014, 09:46:45 AM »
And yet, somehow, the university didn't have to close its doors or shut down all of its sports programs.

Just as Marquette continued to exist and its athletic department became richer than ever.

Look, I wish we still were the Warriors, but the drama is so overdone.


Yeah I have learned a valuable lesson wrt the Marquette nickname debate.  It really isn't that big of a deal.  Like you, I would love to still be "Warriors."  But in the end, I just don't care all that much.

Coleman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3450
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #69 on: July 11, 2014, 09:46:50 AM »
I spoke to cords during the whole lightning versus eagles debate and qwestioned him why they were choosing between two stupid nicknames and not just go with golden avalanche.  He stated that avalanche was rejected because they couldnt come up with a mascot.  So i asked him , well what a bout lightning which really has the same problem?  He couldnt answer me.  Didnt create much confidence in our leadership for me.

Yeah, I really don't understand why Hilltoppers and Golden Avalanche weren't seriously looked at back in 1993-1994. It makes absolutely no sense to me.

I understand and support the move from Warriors (don't want to get into that debate...frankly I'm sick of having it) but why they jumped to generic Golden Eagles vs. Lightning is mind boggling when they already had 2 historic nicknames with loads of tradition sitting in the stable waiting to be used.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #70 on: July 11, 2014, 09:50:54 AM »
Golden Avalanche was unique to the football team, and I don't think was ever official.  But yeah I agree with you Bleuteaux on all counts.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22132
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #71 on: July 11, 2014, 10:29:37 AM »

Yeah I have learned a valuable lesson wrt the Marquette nickname debate.  It really isn't that big of a deal.  Like you, I would love to still be "Warriors."  But in the end, I just don't care all that much.

Amen brother
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12275
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #72 on: July 11, 2014, 10:51:26 AM »
Yeah, I really don't understand why Hilltoppers and Golden Avalanche weren't seriously looked at back in 1993-1994. It makes absolutely no sense to me.



I don't think the university wanted any connection to the Avalanche Bar, which they tore down a few years later. Alcohol consumption and naked beers slides didn't fit what the administration wanted to sell any better than Warriors did.

Galway Eagle

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10463
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #73 on: July 11, 2014, 11:05:46 AM »
What's that quote in Miracle? The name on the front of the jersey is a heck of a lot more important than the one on the back.  I know that the mascot isn't on the back but the point is the name on the front of the jersey is what's important and that's always been Marquette no matter Blue and Gold, Hilltoppers, Warriors, Golden Avalanche, Golden Eagles, Gold and anything else we've been called. 
Maigh Eo for Sam

Coleman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3450
Re: Why MU Picked Warriors In 1954?
« Reply #74 on: July 11, 2014, 11:13:46 AM »
I don't think the university wanted any connection to the Avalanche Bar, which they tore down a few years later. Alcohol consumption and naked beers slides didn't fit what the administration wanted to sell any better than Warriors did.

I guess, but that would be like UW not wanting Badgers because there was a bar on campus named "The Badger"

Just seems like a lame excuse

 

feedback